Table 1 The summary statistical results when the absolute VTEC mean estimated from wavelet network model is compared with the ones estimated from CODE, JPL and IGS GIM models for training dataset (4Â days)
From: Regional ionospheric modeling using wavelet network model
Statistical parameter | WN-based model versus CODE GIM model | WN-based model versus JPL GIM model | WN-based model versus IGS GIM model |
|---|---|---|---|
Correlation between the WNbased model and GIM model | 87.9% | 86.7% | 87.7% |
RMS error between the WNbased model and GIM model | 2.51 TECU | 2.75 TECU | 2.50 TECU |
ercentage of error | 3.4% | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Absolute VTEC error bias | 1.95 TECU | 1.90 TECU | 1.78 TECU |
Absolute VTEC maximum error | 7.9 TECU | 8.54 TECU | 7.3 TECU |