A new approach for cycle slip detection and fix using single GPS receiver’s single satellite dual frequency data containing arbitrarily large pseudorange errors

The Journal of Global Positioning Systems

Table 2 The remaining cycle slip candidate pairs \( \left[{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_1^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{cand}},{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_2^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{cand}}\right] \)

Series number	\( \left[{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_1^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{cand}}-{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_1^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{min}}\right] \)(unit: cycles)	\( \left[{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_2^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{cand}}-{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_2^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{min}}\right] \)(unit: cycles)	\( {\mathrm{TECR}}_{\Phi}^{\mathrm{part}2}\left(\mathrm{k}\right) \)(unit: TECU/s)	\( \left[{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_1^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{cand}},{\Delta \mathrm{N}}_2^{\mathrm{p}}{\left(\mathrm{k}\right)}_{\mathrm{cand}}\right] \)(unit: cycles)
1	− 104	−81	− 0.091	[*] + (− 104,−81)
2	− 95	− 74	− 0.060	[*] + (− 95,−74)
3	− 86	−67	− 0.030	[*] + (− 86,−67)
4	−77	− 60	0.000	[*] + (− 77,−60)
5	−68	−53	0.030	[*] + (−68,−53)
6	−59	−46	0.060	[*] + (− 59,−46)
7	−50	− 39	0.091	[*] + (− 50,−39)
8	−41	−32	0.121	[*] + (− 41,−32)
9	−36	−28	−0.121	[*] + (− 36,−28)
10	−27	− 21	− 0.091	[*] + (− 27,−21)
11	−18	−14	− 0.060	[*] + (−18,−14)
12	−9	−7	−0.030	[*] + (−9,−7)
13	0	0	0.000	[*] + (0,0)
14	9	7	0.030	[*] + (9,7)
15	18	14	0.060	[*] + (18,14)
16	27	21	0.091	[*] + (27,21)
17	36	28	0.121	[*] + (36,28)
18	41	32	−0.121	[*] + (41,32)
19	50	39	−0.091	[*] + (50,39)
20	59	46	−0.060	[*] + (59,46)
21	68	53	−0.030	[*] + (68,53)
22	77	60	0.000	[*] + (77,60)
23	86	67	0.030	[*] + (86,67)
24	95	74	0.060	[*] + (95,74)
25	104	81	0.091	[*] + (104,81)